美-유럽의 차기수송헬기 (FTH) 개발 소식...

 

다소 지난 소식입니다만, 지난 6월 AW&ST 紙에서 보도한 美國과 유럽연합의 차기수송헬기 (FTH, Future Transport Helicopter)

공동 개발관련 소식을 소개 합니다.

 

기사에 의하면 美國의 Boeing 社와 유럽 Eurocopter 社가 공동으로 약 70명의 병력을 수송할 수 있는 헬기를 공동으로 개발할 것

을 검토하고 있다는 내용입니다. FTH 는 현재 미 육군의 CH-47 및 독일의 CH-53 중형헬기의 대체, 그리고 현재 뚜렷한 중·대형

헬기를 운용하지 않고 있는 프랑스를 잠재 고객으로 겨냥하고 있다고 합니다.

 

FTH 의 실전배치는 2020년을 목표로 하고 있다고 합니다만, 이 기사가 보도된 지난 6월 이후 현재까지 양사간의 FTH 개발과 관련

된 후속 소식은 없는 상태입니다.

 

한편 FTH 의 향후 경쟁 기종으로는 美 Sikorsky 社가 개발 중인 기존 CH-53E 의 확대개량형 CH-53K 가 될 것이라는 언급입니다.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Heavy Lifting

Aviation Week & Space Technology, 06/14/2010

Author : Robert Wall

 

Development strategies are crystallizing for a new heavy-lift helicopter with the European Defense Agency release of a request for information and NATO working on turning an alliance staff target for such a rotorcraft into an actual requirement.

 

One key design feature involves carrying a load internally, rather than using sling loads. Aarne Kreuzinger-Janik, German air force chief of staff, wants the helo to carry 70 troops (or 13-15 metric tons of payload) with a range of 300 km. (185 mi.) in difficult environmental conditions. The system would be in the 80,000-lb. class.

 

Eurocopter and Boeing are jointly preparing for the Future Transport Helicopter (FTH) project, a potentially cooperative venture between the U.S. and several European states. The goal would be to provide the U.S. Army with a CH-47 replacement. In Germany, the FTH is aimed at replacing CH‑53s, while France wants to establish a heavy-lift capability it now lacks.

 

The exact work allocation between Boeing and Eurocopter is not set; but under the terms of the initial agreement, Boeing would serve as the prime contractor for any U.S. activity and Eurocopter would do the same in Europe, says Eurocopter CEO Lutz Bertling. The goal is to have a heavy-lift capability available around 2020.

 

Boeing’s director for rotorcraft strategy, David L. Jones, notes that the cabin size will be key and has to be about the same as a C-130’s.

 

If a U.S.-European FTH project goes forward, it could provide the only meaningful transatlantic effort for the foreseeable future, Bertling asserts.

 

He says the FTH plan being devised by his company and Boeing relies on the use of the latest available technology. “[But] we want to avoid the errors we have had in the past,” he says, acknowledging development hurdles on other new rotorcraft projects. Jones says the systems should be at a technology-readiness Level 6, where they have been demonstrated.

 

In addition, Bertling says workshare will be allocated by capability, rather than apportioned to allow a company to build a technology skill it currently lacks.

 

But the Boeing/Eurocopter team is not unchallenged. Sikorsky is proposing the CH-53K now in development for the U.S. Marine Corps. It would provide the ideal jumping-off point to meet the heavy-lift need.

 

Joseph Gigantelli, Sikorsky’s vice president for sales for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, says efforts now underway to build industrial ties in Germany for the Cyclone represent a good stepping stone to introduce the CH-53K in Europe.

 

On the engine side, Germany’s MTU is throwing its weight behind using the GE38 for the new rotorcraft, a program in which it has taken a strategic stake. The GE38 powers the CH-53K already.

 

Jones adds that the Rolls-Royce AE1107C would also provide a suitable engine along with the GE38.

 

 

  U.S. Army CH-47F Chinook ⓒ U.S. Army

 

  U.S. Army CH-47F Chinook ⓒ U.S. Army

 

  U.S. Marine Corps CH-53E Super Stallion ⓒ U.S. Navy

 

  ⓒ U.S. Navy

 

  ⓒ U.S. Navy

 

  ⓒ U.S. Navy

 

  U.S. Marine Corps CH-53E Super Stallion & CH-46 Sea Knights ⓒ U.S. Navy

 

  U.S. Navy MH-53E Sea Dragon ⓒ U.S. Navy

 

  U.S. Navy MH-53E Sea Dragon ⓒ U.S. Navy